Cabinet tires of Starmer, plots exit

Source: thetimes.com

TL;DR

The story at a glance

Patrick Maguire's column claims Labour cabinet ministers are openly despairing over Keir Starmer's leadership amid poor polls and recent scandals, with little loyalty left for a prime minister who shows scant interest in MPs or his government. Key figures like Ed Miliband and Pat McFadden struggled to defend him on television this week, while council leaders such as Anas Sarwar and Eluned Morgan are poised to blame him post-election. This is reported now as cabinet frustration boils over ahead of local elections on May 8, 2026. The piece builds on context from a messy security vetting row involving Lord Mandelson's aborted US ambassador appointment.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

Key points

Details and context

Maguire describes an "organic" leadership crisis building from grassroots anger rather than plotted challenges, accelerated by this week's events around Lord Mandelson's security vetting for US ambassador—a tedious Whitehall process that exposed deeper high politics.

Cabinet loyalty was always thin, sustained by perks like cars and red boxes, but constituents now echo ministers' view that Starmer is the problem. Defending him on doorstepping or broadcast feels increasingly outrageous, especially given his history of dismissing allies for self-preservation.

The proposed exit is characteristically procedural for Starmer's party: bloodless regicide buying time for manoeuvres while letting him continue international trips. Maguire notes it may be too late to save Labour from electoral ruin.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

Key quotes

“It’s all f*ed in fast forward.” — one cabinet source on the leadership crisis.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

Why it matters

Cabinet disillusion signals potential endgame for Starmer's government, threatening Labour's grip after its landslide win. For party members and MPs, it means bracing for post-May 8 recriminations that could force a leadership change, reshaping policy and unity. Watch local election results on May 8 and any immediate cabinet briefings or Starmer statements, though a smooth transition remains speculative.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

What changed

Ministers previously upheld a pretence of respect for Starmer despite private doubts over five years. Now, after this week's TV defences and private vents to the chief whip, they no longer hide their despair openly. This shift emerged this week amid Mandelson vetting fallout.

FAQ

Q: What election losses does the column predict for Labour?

A: Losses everywhere on May 8, including Scotland and Wales to nationalists, and English wards by the Mersey, Thames, and Tyne to Reform, Greens, and even Tories. Council leaders will blame Starmer publicly. MPs and grassroots will face unprepared shock.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

Q: Why have cabinet ministers turned against Starmer?

A: They see his haughty disinterest in their work and MPs, plus self-preservation over loyalty; defending him now feels indefensible amid constituent anger. The pretence that built his premiership has collapsed.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

Q: What leadership transition does Maguire foresee?

A: Post-May 8, Starmer sets a timetable for orderly exit, new leader by conference; suits Rayner, Miliband, Haigh to back Burnham's return and spares ambitious ministers messy bids.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)

Q: How does the Mandelson row factor in?

A: The vetting saga underscores low morale but matters less than cabinet candour on Starmer's flaws; it's the backdrop to ministers dropping pretence this week.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/cabinet-knows-that-starmer-is-done-for-cn3kt6ffz#Echobox=1776963546)