Clarkson: Hairy-armpit mob's green claims are all wrong

Source: thesun.co.uk

TL;DR

The story at a glance

Jeremy Clarkson writes a column ripping into "hairy-armpitted" animal rights activists for their ignorance and wrong-headed environmental arguments. He focuses on Emma Smart, a self-proclaimed marine biologist who grabbed a crayfish from a restaurant tank and chucked it into the sea, where it died along with its partner. The piece ran this week after Smart's court case, tying into Clarkson's long-running mockery of vegan and eco-campaigners.

Key points

Details and context

Clarkson paints animal rights types as beach-bum posers who sing kumbaya on tropical sands but know sod all about real wildlife, like lobsters' dim wits or crayfish habitats. He contrasts their quinoa push with meat farming, arguing crop pesticides wipe out far more life indirectly through food chain collapse.[[1]](https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/38852820/armpit-animal-rights-mob-wrong-jeremy-clarkson/)[[2]](https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/38852820/armpit-animal-rights-mob-wrong-jeremy-clarkson)

The column mixes this takedown with asides: fat jabs left him weak like a Lowry painting, needing gym work; a silk-clad mannequin ballooned to space beat AI fakes for originality; Olly Robbins likely buried a security report on ambassador Peter Mandlespoon to help Starmer; BBC exposed migrants faking gay claims for benefits and cars.

Clarkson wants Starmer battered by scandals so he can't push more socialist policies, showing his Tory-leaning view.

Key quotes

Why it matters

Clarkson challenges eco-activists' push for plant-based diets as not just wrong but deadly to wildlife, flipping green arguments on meat. Readers weighing veganism for the planet get a blunt counter with specifics on crop harms, while farmers and meat eaters feel backed. Watch if Smart's case or quinoa rows spark more activist clashes or policy pushes on food emissions.