Lawyers abandon law on Porter amid mob calls

Source: theaustralian.com.au

TL;DR

The story at a glance

Janet Albrechtsen criticises lawyers for abandoning rule-of-law basics amid public pressure on Christian Porter, Australia's then-Attorney-General, over historical rape allegations he denies. The column came out on March 9, 2021, days after an ABC report sparked a media storm and calls for an independent inquiry. Porter had stepped aside from some duties but faced demands from prominent lawyers to quit or face probe.[[1]](https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/lawyers-abandon-the-law-on-porter/news-story/8d158937b71793202dbac6b3b49d5747)

Key points

Details and context

The piece responds to early 2021 uproar after ABC's Four Corners detailed anonymous claims Porter raped a 16-year-old in 1988; he identified himself, denied it, and sued ABC for defamation (later settled without trial).[[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Porter)

Prominent lawyers like Tom Brennan argued Porter, as Attorney-General, should face professional conduct standards or step down, while MinterEllison's CEO Annette Kimmitt quit after emailing staff criticising the firm for taking Porter as a client.[[4]](https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/mar/10/boss-of-law-firm-minterellison-reportedly-steps-down-over-christian-porter-furore)

Albrechtsen frames this as "woke" pressure overriding legal norms like innocence until proven guilty, especially with no evidence for police action.

Key quotes

Why it matters

Lawyers joining public pile-ons risks eroding core principles like presumption of innocence and fair process, weakening democracy. For politicians and professionals, it means allegations alone can end careers without proof or trial. Watch if Porter's defamation settlement or later career moves prompt more on legal ethics in scandals.[[3]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Porter)