Starmer echoes Heath in crises and style

Source: thetimes.com

TL;DR

The story at a glance

Dominic Sandbrook's column draws parallels between Keir Starmer's premiership since summer 2024 and Edward Heath's in the early 1970s. Both face economic stagnation, Middle East wars and oil shocks—1973's Yom Kippur War for Heath, a 2026 Iran conflict for Starmer. The piece is prompted by current events mirroring history, as noted by Daniel Finkelstein.

Key points

Details and context

Sandbrook notes Starmer joined Labour as a teen in the mid-1970s, around Heath's fall, making the resemblance fitting. Heath's biographer called him nervously content to ride waves in opposition, echoing Starmer's pre-2024 caution. External shocks hit hard: Heath faced surprise Yom Kippur attack triggering oil surge when inflation loomed; Starmer deals with Iran war fallout.

Both presented as competent alternatives to flashy predecessors—Heath's "computer mind" using experts; Starmer businesslike against Tory "chancers". Yet government exposed limits: paperwork and reports don't sway voters without vision.

Heath sulked post-defeat blaming luck; Sandbrook says skilful leaders turn events around. Parallels highlight timeless politics—administrators falter without "alchemy" of narrative.[[1]](https://www.thetimes.com/comment/columnists/article/keir-starmer-remind-edward-heath-hk30khlgj)

Key quotes

Why it matters

UK politics recycles patterns, with technocrats vulnerable to crises like oil shocks that punish incumbents regardless of effort. For voters and MPs, it means Starmer risks Heath's fate if he can't inspire beyond boxes ticked—stagnant approval could spark internal revolt. Watch energy prices, Iran escalation and Starmer's narrative shift, though history suggests luck alone won't save him.