economist.com
Source: economist.com
- Donald Trump faces four bad options for handling a potential war in Iran if re-elected.
- Options include escalation, negotiation, sanctions, or inaction, each with high risks like wider conflict or nuclear breakout.
- Iran's nuclear advances and proxy attacks make any choice likely to fail or backfire badly.
The article examines the tough choices President Trump would have for a war in Iran, assuming he wins re-election amid escalating tensions. It involves Iran, its proxies like Hezbollah and the Houthis, Israel, and America, with Iran's nuclear programme nearing weapons-grade capability. The core argument is that all four paths - striking hard, talking tough, squeezing economically, or doing little - lead to disaster. This matters because it could spark a regional war, spike oil prices, or let Ira