Art by monsters: separate or skip?

Source: vox.com

TL;DR

The story at a glance

Constance Grady examines the tension between loving art and learning its creator faces abuse allegations, spotlighting cases like Johnny Depp, Woody Allen, Louis C.K., and others.[[1]](https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/11/17933686/me-too-separating-artist-art-johnny-depp-woody-allen-louis-ck)[[2]](https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/11/17933686/me-too-separating-artist-art-johnny-depp-woody-allen-michael-jackson-louis-ck) It critiques the mantra to separate artist from art as one limited tool among literary theories. The piece came out in fall 2018 as #MeToo revelations piled up against high-profile figures.

Key points

Details and context

The article traces "separate the art" back to New Criticism's push to professionalize lit crit, making it like science by ditching author gossip. Postmodernism flips it: readers co-create, so you can wrest control from creeps like Woody Allen or Roman Polanski.[[1]](https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/10/11/17933686/me-too-separating-artist-art-johnny-depp-woody-allen-louis-ck)

Today, no pure split works—art ties to its era, but you can rethink it personally. Critics like Amy Hungerford ditch Wallace because his books echo real-life abuse patterns; Claire Hayes-Brady says love art that speaks to you, flaws and all.

Boycotts hit wallets but don't erase past cultural impact. Grady stays split on Depp: can't unlove or undisgust the film.

Key quotes

Why it matters